This page displays articles relating to the sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church.
 |
Wed, 14-Jan-2004 McCormack must go in light of new documents |
|
Sat, 13-Sep-2003 Strapped diocese should scrap retreat at lavish resort |
|
Fri, 12-Sep-2003 Gregoire used by diocese to ameliorate past mistakes |
|
Sun, 7-Sep-2003 Priest Takes on Bishop |
|
Sun, 7-Sep-2003 Clerical Doubletalk Raises Doubts About Investigation |
|
Fri, 29-Aug-2003 "Mixed Messages" from McCormack? |
|
Wed, 27-Aug-2003 Vatican Appeal Succeeds in Priest Reinstatement |
|
Sun, 3-Aug-2003 McCormack misses spirit of the law |
|
Fri, 1-Aug-2003 The Half Truths of Bishop McCormack |
|
Fri, 1-Aug-2003 NH Catholics, why have you forsaken us? |
|
Thu, 31-Jul-2003 Canon law allows for resignations of NH bishops |
|
Wed, 30-Jul-2003 Despite tradition, bishop must go |
|
Fri, 25-Jul-2003 Group’s petition seeks resignation of bishops |
|
Fri, 25-Jul-2003 McCormack's reputation continues to plummet |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Yes, someone behaved responsibly in Boston |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Petitioners: McCormack must resign |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Abuse enablers must follow Law into retirement |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Over 1000 Catholics Sign for Bishops' Resignations |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Bishops Invited to Open Forum |
|
Thu, 24-Jul-2003 Report: McCormack failed some sex abuse victims |
|
Wed, 23-Jul-2003 MA Attorney General report on church abuse |
|
Sun, 20-Jul-2003 Problems won't leave while McCormack is here |
|
Sat, 12-Jul-2003 Priest Psychiatrist Calls McCormack a 'Liar' |
|
Wed, 9-Jul-2003 Christian to be Deposed in Sex Abuse Suit |
|
Wed, 18-Jun-2003 21 Bishops Have Resigned |
|
Mon, 16-Jun-2003 Bishop O'Brien Arrested in Fatal Hit-and-Run |
|
Mon, 16-Jun-2003 Keating Resigns from National Review Board |
|
Mon, 9-Jun-2003 Catholic Teen Retreat Closes in Manchester |
|
Mon, 26-May-2003 Survivor Support Letter |
|
Mon, 26-May-2003 McCormack's Presence in Auburn Draws Protest |
|
Sun, 25-May-2003 Parishioners Blame NH Bishops |
|
Mon, 19-May-2003 Pastoral Council Calls for McCormack Resignation |
|
Tue, 29-Apr-2003 Concord Monitor Editorial: Unrepentant |
|
Wed, 9-Apr-2003 Union Leader: McCormack's Mess: Bishop's pride continues to divide church |
|
Wed, 9-Apr-2003 Church Disunity in the Priest Scandal |
|
Wed, 9-Apr-2003 Boston Globe: Tactics Suit the Guilty |
|
Fri, 4-Apr-2003 Concord Monitor Editorial: No Trespassing |
|
Thu, 3-Apr-2003 Telegraph Calls for McCormack, Christian to Resign |
|
Wed, 2-Apr-2003 CA Diocese Sues Boston Archdiocese Over |
McCormack's Classmate Shanley
|
Tue, 1-Apr-2003 Diocese Attempts to Bar Access |
|
Mon, 31-Mar-2003 NH Catholics Call for Resignations |
|
Sat, 15-Mar-2003 Polls Show Bishop Should Resign |
|
Sun, 2-Feb-2003 Parish Cites Abuse Crisis for Donation Decline |
|
New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership P.O. Box 84 Nashua, NH 03061-0084
For Immediate Release
January 14, 2004
McCormack must resign or be removed in light of new documents
Failed to help investigation or warn victim of health risks NASHUA, NH - New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership (NHCML) reiterates its call for the resignation of Bishop John McCormack in light of documents filed in Suffolk Superior Court last evening that show he knew authorities were investigating a priest in 1994 about molesting a 16 year old boy and he failed to offer information about the victim's identity. The authorities wanted to determine if the youth was a minor under the law or if coercion and rape were involved, according to the Boston Globe. With questions hanging, McCormack was aware the Rev. Barry Robinson, 53 at the time, was leaving the country for his native Australia, and had a history of "the same difficulty" in Australia and Chile. He was told, "the priest has done this before 'but was not caught'," in notes from Sr. Catherine Mulkerrin. She also wrote that Robinson admitted he "molested a boy." There is also no indication McCormack sought to learn if others in Boston were molested as well. This was in keeping with his refusal numerous times to authorize Sr. Mulkerrin to seek out potential victims in parishes where abuse had occurred. "The corruption of John McCormack in handling this case is further testament of his horrific record of protecting priests at all costs," said Carolyn Disco, a founding member of NHCML. Robinson is currently assistant pastor at St. Mary's of the Immaculate Conception in the diocese of Melbourne, Australia, reportedly under restrictions. The documents show that Robinson, who served at Blessed Sacrament parish in Jamaica Plain, MA in the early 90's, admitted abuse to his therapist. The therapist reported it to authorities in accord with the law. As a result, McCormack quickly became involved in a cover-up that kept vital information secret so Robinson could depart from the United States unhindered. After Robinson's return to Australia, McCormack continued to monitor developments, writing to a colleague in Melbourne, "assure Barry that no further steps have been taken regarding any civil complaint," and later, that "At one time, the civil authorities were looking for further information about him but were unsuccessful, to my knowledge." McCormack then went on to seek legal advice about the possibility of Robinson's arrest should he return to the United States for treatment, learning it was "minimal." The fact an arrest was feared indicates the gravity of the offense. In addition, McCormack knew of Robinson's high-risk behaviors and that there was an exchange of bodily fluids. Yet he never warned the youth over the last ten years of possible serious health risks from the danger of his developing hepatitis C or HIV AIDS infections. "The travesty in all this is that the bishops have never been held accountable for their evasions and deceit. It is past time for the Vatican to remove these compromised men from office," Disco added. A Zogby poll released just two months ago revealed that 82 percent of lay Catholics want bishops complicit in the sexual abuse scandal to resign and be removed from office. http://www.eppc.org/docLib/20031117_zogbypressrelease.doc NHCML will continue to make that case in whatever ways it can. New Hampshire Catholics can express their desire for resignation by signing a declaration to that effect on www.nhcatholics.org. #### New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership (NHCML) was formed in March 2003 by 15 Catholics from across the state solely to seek the resignations of Bishop John McCormack and Auxiliary Bishop Francis Christian. NHCML published a declaration that calls the bishops to account for their failure to protect children from sexual abuse by priests. Its website, www.nhcatholics.org, has gathered over 1,500 signatures of New Hampshire Catholics who support its goals, and includes extensive documentation on the crisis in the Church. Back to Top |
||
To the editor: In his editorial response, Mr. John Miskus did not go far enough in explaining the extent of Bishop John McCormack’s duplicity regarding the removal and reinstatement of Fr. Paul Gregoire. Not only Bishop McCormack, but Bishop Francis Christian, and Fr. Edward Arsenault, the bishop’s delegate for sexual misconduct, said repeatedly for months, publicly and privately, that the accusation against Fr. Gregoire was "credible." Only two days after Fr. Gregoire’s removal, diocesan spokesman Patrick McGee (according to Foster’s) was telling the people of Dover "the Diocese’s Office of the Delegate and Diocesan Review Board agreed that the accusation was credible." The next day later, Bishop Christian informed parishioners at St. Charles that "the Rev. Paul L. Gregoire was prohibited from ever performing priestly functions again" (Foster’s 12/9). When inquiries were made to the diocese, Fr. Arsenault said to those who asked, "The act of sexual misconduct of a minor by Fr. Gregoire occurred with no doubt in the mind of the Diocesan Review Board or Bishop McCormack." In March, Bishop McCormack wrote to the St. Charles Parish Council telling them, "The accusation has been determined to be credible by the Diocesan Review Board after a thorough investigation. By the Office of the Delegate ... I think you should know, that in light of the above reasons, I have no plan to assign him to ministry." These bishops and their spokesmen maintained that position up until the last minute when a Vatican appeal vindicated Fr. Gregoire and rightly returned him to his parish ministry. They recommended Fr. Gregoire’s removal to the Vatican and maintained that position for nine months even though from December onward, they had in their possession evidence that exonerated Fr. Gregoire. Still, as late as June 4, Mr. McGee was quoted in the Foster’s saying it was a "credible accusation" and that the case of Fr. Gregoire was "out of the diocese’s hands." Only after their case was overturned and a Vatican review recognized the terrible injustice done to Fr. Paul did the Diocese of Manchester begin to claim that their investigation was "ongoing" and that the bishop had determined the evidence was "insufficient." And yet, from December to August, when that investigation was supposedly "ongoing," nobody at the diocese, not Bishop McCormack, not Bishop Christian, not Fr. Arsenault, not spokesman McGee, not Fr. Audet (who was so often at St. Charles), nobody ever made an effort to clarify the record for the sake of the parishioners and Fr. Paul. Until they lost their case on appeal, not once did they ever suggest "that the investigation was ongoing," or that the evidence against Fr. Gregoire was "insufficient," or that there was a chance he could be reinstated. Rather, they allowed the parishioners of St. Charles to suffer without their pastor, as they continued to smear the reputation of a good priest whom they had every reason to believe was innocent. Why? Bishop McCormack, Bishop Christian and Fr. Arsenault were content to use Fr. Gregoire as an example of their tough new attitude toward sexual abuse by priests. Innocent or not, it did not matter. Fr. Gregoire was the make-up call, the overcompensation for past mistakes. He was a convenient show piece for a diocese reeling from bad publicity about Bishop McCormack’s misconduct in Boston, overwhelmed by public outrage at the bishop’s assignment of Roland Cote to a parish in Jaffrey, and sinking fast from the consequence of a state investigation that established how poorly Bishop Christian and the diocese in general had previously handled past sexual misconduct. Indeed, in the same week that Fr. Gregoire was removed, the diocese was concluding its agreement with the state. The report of the Attorney General’s office, which condemned the diocese’s handling of past abuse cases, was published only four days after Fr. Gregoire’s removal. In short, Bishop McCormack smeared the reputation of a good priest, making him and his parish suffer for nine months, and he did so to save his own sorry reputation. They lied about Fr. Gregoire in December, March and June, and they have lied again recently to cover their despicable effort at character assassination. When habitual liars inhabit a chancery, only a complete house cleaning can usher in truth. James Farrell Somersworth Back to Top |
||
By Carolyn Disco for the Merrimack Journal
Bishop John McCormack released a statement to the people of New Hampshire in their bulletins at mass last Sunday as a follow-up to the news this week that the Massachusetts attorney general will not indict him for criminal conduct.
The statement is a classic example of half-truths that ignore the record of the bishop as a person intimately involved in sexual abuse investigations from 1984 to 1994, with particular authority the last two years. Our group, New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership continues to add to the 1,100 signatures posted on its website, www.nhcatholics.org, calling for the resignations of McCormack and Bishop Francis Christian.
McCormack states he was asked “to assist” in handling investigations, which minimizes his key role throughout. He investigated complaints for various bishops, the man on the scene essentially, culminating in the full time position of delegate for sexual misconduct. Attorney General Thomas Reilly noted “…the Delegate operated with a great deal of autonomy.”
McCormack often blames Cardinal Bernard Law as the decision maker, when his own records fail to show recommendations or objections contrary to Law’s actions. In fact, disbelieving victim/survivors, lying to them, preventing outreach to other possible survivors, and refusing to recommend the removal of abusive priests, were hallmarks of his “assistance.”
As he learned more, McCormack writes, “My efforts culminated in 1993 with the implementation of the first comprehensive written policy regarding the handling of complaints and the creation of a Review Board of experts from the public.” True.
But what is left out in McCormack’s letter is that the key provisions suggested by four experts at Harvard and Boston University medical schools, as well as survivor themselves, were not included in the policy. These included reporting to legal authorities, and not returning priests to ministry since the evidence for relapse was “overwhelming.”
McCormack still trumpeted that the policy had been developed with survivor input, leading survivor Ray Sinibaldi to note last year, “I think in the end they used us.” Carolyn Newberger, a psychologist at Harvard Medical School commented, “I am very angry. I really feel betrayed.”
The limitations of the policy are evident in the great number of priests removed since the scandal broke, and the fact that it took the actual release of documents in 2002, nine years later, to achieve that effect. Before the ink was really dry in 1993, McCormack was pleading for the return to ministry of one priest who molested a 12-year old boy.
McCormack writes further in his statement, “ My desire to help everyone affected and to protect children continues today as the diocesan Bishop of Manchester.” It is regrettable McCormack chooses to use the word, “continue,” since it is not his desire but his deeds that just avoided criminal prosecution.
The sharp contrast between desire and actions to implement that desire are criminal in all but the legal sense. A Jesuit psychiatrist who evaluated priests for McCormack said in a deposition, McCormack “is a liar.” He later attempted to soften that wording but an errata sheet in a deposition cannot be used to change what was said under oath; “it is not a take home examination,” according to case law.
McCormack continues: “My ministry during the last five years as the Bishop of Manchester has enabled me to implement important new steps to ensure the protection of children and young people…to strengthen the Diocese of Manchester’s sexual abuse policy.” This was the same kind of strengthening that marked the Boston policy noted above: all procedures still resulting in abusive priests in service – until the press broke the story and McCormack hurriedly responded.
McCormack then lists review board, staff, and task force additions, training sessions and survivor support group initiatives. But the listing of these actions, which really qualify as forced virtue after being caught, exemplifies McCormack and Christian’s owning of the solution but not the crisis.
Pass over the crisis with pallid statements about mistakes made and harm done, but where is the deep public penance that seeks to correct a grave moral imbalance in the Body of Christ? Not one word of contrition is in a letter occasioned by Attorney General Reilly’s scathing report.
NHCML asks where is the acknowledgement from the bishops that 1) we are guilty of criminally endangering children, 2) that their bodies and souls were molested by our decision to protect our positions and our reputations, 3) that in the words of the New Hampshire attorney general we were willfully blind, consciously ignorant and flagrantly indifferent to the dangers priests posed to children?
This is the plain truth that the bishops skirt with public relations like McCormack’s letter.
Carolyn Disco is a founding member of New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership. The organization was founded in March 2003 by 15 Catholics from across the state solely to seek the resignations of Bishop John McCormack and Auxiliary Bishop Francis Christian.
Back to Top
|
||
In responding to calls by more than 1,000 New Hampshire Catholics for the
resignations of Bishops John McCormack and Francis Christian, the diocesan
chancellor, the Rev. Edward Arsenault, remarked that in his view, “they’ve
proposed a solution to the crisis in the church that’s not part of our
tradition” (Telegraph, July 25). Back to Top |
July 24, 2003
New Hampshire Catholics for Moral
Leadership
Bishop John B. McCormack
We invite you to participate in a forum,
open to New Hampshire Catholics, the public and the media, to discuss the
question of your leadership within the Diocese and the Catholic Church, and
the reasons why so many New Hampshire Catholics believe you cannot remain in
leadership positions and effectively lead this Diocese. These are public
questions of grave importance to Catholics and citizens in New Hampshire.
They are questions that need to be raised openly, frankly, honestly, and
directly. New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership, P.O. Box 18, Nashua, New Hampshire, 03061-0018. Back to Top |
||
For Immediate Release MANCHESTER - New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership (NHCML) today delivered the names of more than 1,000 New Hampshire Catholics calling for the resignations of Bishops John McCormack and Francis Christian to the Diocese of Manchester. The list represents
practicing Catholics from across New Hampshire who signed in support of
NHCML's declaration outlining the reasons McCormack and Christian should
resign. The signatures were gathered on the
group's website (www.nhcatholics.org)
by online entries or by US mail at NHCML, P.O. Box 84, Nashua, NH 03061. Catholics speaking out
forcefully on the quality of their bishops’ leadership is a new experience,
and one that is undertaken in the face of significant obstacles. NH
Catholics was barred from spreading its message at parishes around the
state, and not allowed to post its web address in parish bulletins. The
group appealed directly to Chancellor Edward Arsenault on May 9, 2003 to
reverse his instruction to pastors to "refrain from allowing NHCML from
distributing any material” on parish property. That letter has gone
unanswered. NHCML members refer to the change of leadership in the Archdiocese of Boston as an example of how replacing tainted leaders can improve morale in a church that has lost respect, donations, and many members in the course of this crisis. "Catholics in the
Archdiocese of Boston have hope for the first time in a long time," said
Farrell. "While still supporting survivors of abuse, new leadership is
allowing the Church in Boston to move forward in a way that wasn't possible
before. We want to see those same winds of change blow through New
Hampshire." Back to Top |
||
|
||
Dennis Wagner and
Judd Slivka Back to Top |
||
Text of Keating's Letter, Bishop's Reply By The Associated Press The texts of the Monday resignation letter from National Review Board chairman and former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating to Bishop Wilton Gregory, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Gregory's reply: ___ Dear Bishop Gregory: As I have shared with you over the last two months, I intended to relinquish my chairmanship of the National Catholic Review Board on the first year anniversary of the creation of the Board. That time is this week. During the last year, we accomplished much. Under your leadership and with the bishops' own mandate, we have begun the causes and context, scope and audit processes. The audit is the most significant. Never again will any bishop be able to hide or avoid the scandal of sex abuse in his diocese. As a former FBI agent and U.S. attorney, I am convinced that pouring law enforcement and audit resources annually into each diocese will reclaim Catholic lay confidence. All of us can be assured of zero tolerance, transparency and criminal referral because outsiders will make sure that that is the case. We also created the Office of Child and Youth Protection, headed by a law enforcement professional. Our message was clear. Sex abuse is not just a moral lapse. It is a crime that should be fully prosecuted. As I have recently said, and have repeated on several occasions, our church is a faith institution. A home to Christ's people. It is not a criminal enterprise. It does not condone and cover up criminal activity. It does not follow a code of silence. My remarks, which some bishops found offensive, were deadly accurate. I make no apology. To resist grand jury subpoenas, to suppress the names of offending clerics, to deny, to obfuscate, to explain away; that is the model of a criminal organization, not my church. The humiliation, the horrors of the sex scandal must be a poisonous aberration, a black page in our history that cannot ever recur. It has been disastrous to the church in America. Most of America's bishops are fully supportive of the board's efforts. They have led and led well and have stood up for virtue. Your own leadership has been extraordinary and courageous. You are a model of the Good Shepherd. Thank you for the opportunity to serve our faith. Frequently, it was an agony, but with humility and a devotion to the simple truths of the New Testament, good will always prevail. Sincerely, Frank Keating ___ Dear Governor Keating: I have received your letter in which you offer your resignation as chairman and as a member of the National Review Board. I accept your resignation with an awareness of the enormous contribution you have made to the church in the United States and to the board as its first chairman. A little over a year ago the bishops passed the ``Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People'' in which we recognize the necessity of having significant lay participation in assessing whether we are living up to what we pledge in the Charter. I will always be grateful to you for your immediate and generous willingness to contribute to this unprecedented endeavor. Both as a devout Catholic and as a governor who met the challenge of leading his state through the tragedy of a devastating act of domestic terrorism, you struck me as having the qualities needed to take on the task that I gave to you. Your work this past year only served to confirm my earlier intuition. Because the task you took on was unprecedented and had to be carried out in an intense environment which gives rise to strong emotions under the close observation of the media, there were bound to be moments of difficulty. At such times I found you open and responsive to my assessments of the situation. The board's contribution to resolving the sexual abuse crisis depends on its willingness to offer an honest appraisal of the steps being taken by the bishops to protect children and young people. I know it was in this spirit that you sought to lead the board during its first year, and I am sure it will continue in this fashion. With heartfelt gratitude for your contribution and with prayers and best wishes for you and your family, I am Sincerely yours in the Lord, Bishop Wilton D. Gregory AP-NY-06-16-03 1846EDT Copyright 2003, The Associated Press. The information
|
||
Back to Top
|
||
May 26, 3002 To the editor: New Hampshire Catholics for Moral Leadership (www.nhcatholics.org) supports the 61 survivors of clergy sexual abuse who recently settled their cases with the Diocese of Manchester. Their courageous action in coming forward makes the Diocese accountable for its failure to protect them as children against predatory priests. It also brings a measure of justice in response to the grievous molestation of their bodies and souls. We are all in their debt for bringing the truth to light. It is disappointing that in their press release, Bishop John McCormack and Rev. Edward Arsenault, his delegate for sexual misconduct, refer only to "many people who reported being sexually abused," or "report being harmed," or "made claims that they were harmed." Survivors are mentioned as "complainants" or "these individuals;" a sexually abusive priest is an "accused person." In other words, a frank admission of any diocesan liability never appears, though the New Hampshire Attorney General's report is based on it. Nowhere is it stated that "survivors" actually experienced sexual abuse at the hands of priests who committed crimes. The pale, self-serving language of public relations is the Diocese's modus operandi. According to press reports during the course of the survivors' lawsuits, the Diocese invoked the statute of limitations and the Fifth Amendment, refused to turn over personnel records or allow the questioning of Church officials, and simply ignored their attorney's request late last year to keep their names confidential. The court does not publicize the names of survivors, and the press generally defers to their requests for anonymity; so it was the Diocese refusing to say it would honor confidentiality if the lawsuit, versus a settlement, went forward. This violated McCormack's own statements about the importance of survivor confidentiality in what is another disconnect between his words and actions. While the Diocese has the right to use any legal maneuver afforded by litigation practices, it cannot claim the moral high ground in doing so. Rev. Thomas Doyle, the noted canon lawyer who has testified on behalf of hundreds of survivors, advises the Church must never step out of character as a sensitive, caring and responsible entity, including in the actions of its legal counsel. This was not the experience of the 61 survivors represented by Attorney Mark Abramson, who responded angrily in the press at the time of the Diocese's countermoves. The delay and intimidation by the Diocese contradict its claim that it used "a caring approach with every individual who has approached the Church in New Hampshire in the last year." Such is not the case, given these tactics. We agree that favorable court rulings for Abramson's clients weighed more heavily than pastoral concerns in reaching agreement. The settlement resolves these matters, but does not negate the pain the Diocese caused in its interim strategies under the authority of Bishop John McCormack. NHCML agrees with those survivors who state that a truly satisfactory resolution of their cases includes the resignation or removal of McCormack. It continues to maintain that his presence and that of Bishop Francis Christian compromise the genuine healing necessary for all to move forward. The spiritual and financial disaster their malfeasance enabled must be forthrightly acknowledged and redressed. Sincerely, NH Catholics for Moral Leadership Back to Top
|
Back to Top
|
||
Back to Top |
||
May 19,2003
St. Charles Pastoral Council 577 Central Avenue Dover, NH 03820
An open letter to Bishop John McCormack:
Dear Bishop McCormack,
Last November, while you were embroiled in multiple lawsuits in Massachusetts, while you were negotiating with the New Hampshire Attorney General to save the Diocese from criminal prosecution, and while you were under pressure to resign as Bishop, you removed our Pastor, Father Paul Gregoire from active ministry based on what you said was a credible allegation which occur-red over thirty years ago. We support Father Gregoire and believe that he is not being treated fairly by you and the Diocese. We wrote to you expressing our concerns and your reply was polite, but missed the point entirely.
It is our opinion that you should not be the person who sits in judgment of Father Gregoire or of any priest who is accused of wrongdoing. Your actions, along with others in your prior assignment in Massachusetts are the cause of the crisis in our church. The Catholic ministry is for people who want to help people and assist in converting others to our Faith. You must admit that your actions have caused a lot of pain to a lot of people and a lot of the people no longer attend church nor contribute financially. With the pressures you had last November, this allegation against Father Gregoire gave you the opportunity to deflect scrutiny.
Father Gregoire, who spent over forty years as a priest with no allegations of wrongdoing prior to this accusation, deserves to be judged by someone who is not part of the problem. Can you imagine the uproar if Governor Benson appointed Amanda Bortner as head of the Children's Protective Services? Is this any different than you holding on to your position?
PLEASE, Bishop McCormack, take your baggage, step aside and let somebody who is credible judge Father Gregoire and rebuild this Diocese.
Respectfully,
St. Charles Pastoral Council Richard Valliere - Chairman Thelma Anne Gitschier Jean N. Angers Pauline Bonneau Suzanne K. Christenbury Robert R. Emond Priscilla L Guppy Robert L. Hamilton Yvonne Hamilton Mark J. Hebert Susan M Kilday James J. Rousseau
Back to Top |
||
Back to Top |
Back to Top |
||
Back to Top |
||
Back to Top |
Back to Top |
Back to Top |
Over McCormack's Classmate Shanley Back to Top |
|
|